Legal Opinion

Nicolou v. Clements

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided February 25, 1994No. 93-0649PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HABHAB, Judge.

In this modification action, the plaintiff-appellant asserts on appeal that the trial court erred in (1) refusing to modify, the *906visitation provisions of the paternity decree and (2) in failing to allow the attorney fees as requested in the application for attorney fees. We affirm.

The parties to this action are the parents of Sarah Rose Nicolou, born August 9, 1986. The paternity of the defendant-appellee Sarah was established by court decree entered on August 23, 1989. As a part of that decree, the defendant-appellee was granted visitation with his daughter which included…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of SteenhoekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Donovan v. DonovanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. In Re the Marriage of JeromeCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Remsburg v. RemsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brandon R. Waters v. Jennifer M. AlitzCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
  2. Heather Dawn Helm v. Thomas M. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
  3. Nicolou v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API