Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 27, 2009No. 08-90066, 08-90067, 08-90068, 08-90069, 08-90070, 08-90071, 08-90072, 08-90073, 08-90074, 08-90075, 08-90076, 08-90077, 08-90078, 08-90079, 08-90080, 08-90081, 08-90179, 08-90187, 08-90188, 08-90243, 08-90244, 09-90046, 09-90047, 09-90050PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Complainant, a pro se prisoner, filed six misconduct complaints and several supplements against fourteen circuit judges, five district judges, and three magistrate judges. Complainant filed several civil rights actions and a habeas petition in district court, and numerous appeals and mandamus petitions relating to those matters. The subject judges were assigned to those matters.
The Rules for Judicial-Conduct and Judicial-Disability Proceedings require that judges named in a misconduct complaint be disqualified from considering the complaint. See Judicial-Conduct…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Charge of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Complaint of JudicialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re Complaint of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009