Legal Opinion

Vogt v. Binder

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1906No. 14,219PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the district court for Thurston county: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, 0.

In September, 1897, certain judgments were rendered before a justice of the péace in Thurston county against the plaintiff in error and in favor of one Hattenhauer. These judgments were afterwards assigned to Nick Fritz. Hattenhauer diéd in 1900, and after his death Fritz undertook to enforce collection of the judgments by execution. He was, however, perpetually enjoined from so doing until *362the judgments were revived, it having been held by this court that such procedure was necessary. Vogt v. Daily, 70 Neb. 812. Thereupon, Fritz procured a revivor of the judgments in the name of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Omaha & Southwestern R. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Harrington v. ConnorNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Rakes v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Magemau & Co. v. BellNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Vogt v. DailyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Exchange Elevator Co. v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Dougherty v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Eli's, Inc. v. LemenNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Keefe v. GraceNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. Van BoskirkNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API