Legal Opinion

Southland Corp. v. Edison Tp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 31, 1987Published

1Opinion of the Court

220 N.J. Super. 294 (1987)

531 A.2d 1361

THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND ROSEANNE AMENDOLA, T/A MENLO PARK AMOCO, AMOCO OIL COMPANY & AMOCO CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON AND TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 17, 1987.

Decided March 31, 1987.

Before Judges GAULKIN, BAIME and ASHBEY.

Peter A. DeSarno argued the cause for appellants.

Lee M. Hymerling argued the cause for respondent The Southland Corporation (Archer &…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southland Corp. v. Edison Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  2. Southland Corp. v. Township of EdisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API