Legal Opinion

Ertel v. Warren

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Livingston Circuit Court. — Hon. Arch B. Davis, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, P. J.

— The plaintiff sues ¿o recover for the value of her services rendered to the defendant. The petition contains two counts. The first alleges that defendant agreed to pay plaintiff a reasonable compensation for her services; and that relying upon such promise she entered his service on the 6th of February, 1899, and continued therein until August 1, 1909, with the exception of twelve weeks. She claims that her said services were worth five dollars per week, making a total for the whole time of the value of $2351.57. A credit is given for $163.43 paid in money and other valuables.

The second…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Minor v. LillardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Howard University v. CassellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. Cardinale Ex Rel. Cardinale v. KempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. Kelly v. RossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API