Legal Opinion

Neurath v. Hecht

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 28, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtAlvey, C. J.

The hill in this case was filed by a defendant in a judgment against the plaintiff therein, to obtain an injunction to restrain the execution of the judgment, upon the ground that there was usury in the debt upon which the judgment was recovered. The judgment was founded upon three promissory notes indorsed to the plaintiff in the judgment. These notes were made by Long, one of the complainants, payable to Neurath, the other complainant, and by the latter indorsed to Hecht. Long is one of the complainants in the present bill, though he has never been sued on the notes, — the judgment being…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Powell v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  2. Walker v. CockeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  3. Hill v. ReifsniderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  4. Trumbo v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1833

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Easter v. Overlea Land Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  2. Buckner v. CronhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  3. Talbott v. Laurel Building Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API