Legal Opinion
Kirby v. Dutton
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided October 8, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 3:86-0440PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDERS AND CERTIFICATE OF PROBABLE-CAUSE
NEESE, Senior District Judge.
In this application for the federal writ of habeas corpus on behalf of the petitioner Mr. Frank Kirby, it is claimed he is in the custody of the respondent-warden pursuant to the judgment of January 17,1974 of the Criminal Court of Tennessee for its 13th Judicial District (encompassing White County) in violation of the Constitution, Sixth Amendment, Right to the Assistance of Counsel Clause, and Fourteenth Amendment, § 1, Right to Due Process of Law Clause. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241(c)(3), 2254(a). The respondent…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Frank Kirby v. Michael Dutton, Warden and Michael Cody, Attorney General, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987