Le Duc v. City of Hastings
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Da'kota county, Crosby, J., presiding, overruling a demurrer to the eom--plaint.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action was brought under chapter 3, Laws -1866, as amended by chapter 49, Laws 1867, and chapter 65, Laws 1887. Section 1 makes it the duty of the authorities of any county, .city, or town, in which any tax has been levied for the purpose of paying bounties to volunteers, upon the property of any citizen of the state who on or before January 1,1864, entered the military service of the United States, and has been honorably discharged or resigned, or still remains in such service, or upon the property of the wife, widow, or minor children of such person, upon due proof of • such facts, to…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AlstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- State ex rel. Davidson v. GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State Ex Rel. Matteson v. LueckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Pacific Livestock Co. v. CochranOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Trustees of Pillsbury Academy v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.