Legal Opinion
MUSSI v. Astrue
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 29, 2010No. 2:09cv1218Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID STEWART CERCONE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Paul L. Mussi (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433 (“the Act”). This matter comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. (Docket Nos. 7, 11). The record has been developed at the administrative level. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs Motion for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.