State v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDSON, Chief Justice.
Defendant, Kevin Todd Bishop, appeals from judgment entered after a jury trial for delivery of a controlled substance (cocaine), and for possession of cocaine and marijuana. See Iowa Code § 204.401(1), (3) (1983). We affirm.
Based on the evidence adduced at trial, the jury could have found the following facts. In June 1984 the Newton police department (department) began a local undercover drug trafficking operation, headed by Sergeant Jerry Diamond. Tim Menke, an informant experienced in undercover drug operations, worked with Diamond. The department provided Menke…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- State v. McKettrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- State v. ClineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- State v. NiehausSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Brewer v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.