Legal Opinion

State v. Howe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 15, 1983No. 82-858PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Chief Judge.

The defendant’s trial resulted in a mistrial because of a comment by the state attorney in closing argument. The State filed an amended information, and the defendant responded with a motion to dismiss based on double jeopardy, which the trial court granted. We reverse.

Referring to the defense counsel’s comment that the State did not call certain witnesses, the state attorney responded, “Ladies and Gentlemen, I submit to you that both the State and Mr. McGee have the same subpoena powers.”

The defendant argued that this was a comment on his right not to put on any evidence,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. IglesiasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DixonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. HutchensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API