Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Reese Bros Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 20, 2005No. 04-4594UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Appellants sued under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq., for back pay because they were not notified of a plant closing or mass layoff, sixty days before the layoff or closing as required by the Act. The WARN Act’s notice provision exclusively applies to companies with fifty or more employees, excluding part-time employees, on the date sixty days prior to the date of the plant closing or mass layoff (the “snapshot date”). The burden rests on the plaintiffs to prove that the Act applies.

Following a bench…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., (In No. 93-2008). Charles A. Thomas Darren Boop Robert W. Bower William D. Bridge James Clingan Neal B. Housner Jonathan L. Noaker Wayne D. Orner Gerald W. Ranck Harold E. Van Sickle, Jr. Richard A. Winter Eugene L. Witmer, Sr., (In No. 93-7613) v. North Star Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Giannone v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Moore v. Warehouse Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Johnson v. Telespectrum Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guippone v. Bh S & B Holdings LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. DEL ROSSI v. FORMAN MILLS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API