Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 14, 1984No. AW-473PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Wright contends the trial court erred in denying his Rule 3.850 motion without an evidentiary hearing. His motion alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, failure of the trial court to establish a factual basis for his guilty plea, and his plea of guilty was coerced. We affirm.

The record furnished us clearly shows that before the trial court accepted Wright’s plea of guilty, pursuant to plea bargaining, it determined from Wright, while he was under oath, that he was satisfied with the services of his attorney, that a factual basis for the plea was established, and that his plea…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. IafornaroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Dunkum v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
  3. Puig v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API