Legal Opinion

F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 10, 1968No. C.D. 3464Published

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

The above case has been submitted on a written stipulation reading as follows:

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the items marked “A” and initialed DJC by Import Specialist W. P. Kerley on the invoice covered by the above-named protest, which were classified with duty at 13%% ad valorem (T.D. 52739), under Paragraph 353, Tariff Act of 1930 as modified, consist of melting furnaces imported with, and appraised and classified as entireties with electric motors of more…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API