Legal Opinion

Swenson v. McFerson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 7, 1932No. 13,105PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burice

These parties are hereinafter referred to as Mrs. Swenson and the commissioner, respectively.

The question before us is, Was Mrs. Swenson a stockholder in the Stock Growers State Bank of Burlington, hereinafter called the bank, at the time it was closed?

The bank is in process of liquidation as insolvent. The liability of its stockholder's is fixed by statute at twice the par value of their shares. That value was $100. On the theory that Mrs. Swenson owned five shares, judgment was entered against her for $1,000. To review that judgment she prosecutes this writ and asks that it be made a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kerr v. UrieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  2. Porter v. State Ex Rel. Mothersead, Bank Com'r.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Bundy v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hayutin v. Colorado State Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API