Legal Opinion

Hugelmaier v. Town of Sweden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 25, 1984No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order reversed, without costs, and defendant *996Town of Sweden’s motion granted. Memorandum: Special Term erred in not granting defendant Town of Sweden’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s papers in opposition to defendant’s motion were defective in that they failed to set forth any evidence that defendant had negligently repaired or maintained Redman Road. The conclusory allegation of negligence contained in plaintiff’s attorney’s affidavit, made without personal knowledge of the facts, was without probative value and, hence, insufficient to defeat defendant’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marine Midland Bank v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hugelmaier v. Town of SwedenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Dunster v. City of RomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API