People v. Lett
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. In determining whether an offense is a lesser included offense of the one charged the facts of the particular case, and not the legal abstractions, control (People v Stanfield, 36 NY2d 467; People v Johnson, 39 NY2d 364). On the facts of this case we agree that the trial court properly submitted assault in the third degree as a lesser included offense of robbery in the second degree. We find no merit to the defendant’s alternative argument that the procedure followed violates due process because it does not adequately advise a defendant of the charges actually pending against him.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. StanfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Paterno v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. MiguelNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BeneventoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. La PazNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. BeneventoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997