Brindle v. Brindle
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The litigants, who were husband and wife, were divorced by a final decree entered in the Family Court on August 9, 1979. The present controversy concerns the interpretation given by a Family Court justice of a property-settlement agreement that was incorporated within the final decree. On October 5, 1981, we heard arguments on the husband’s motion that the wife’s appeal be summarily dismissed pursuant to our Rule 16(g) because (1) the trial justice’s factual finding was not clearly *719wrong and (2) the applicable law is well settled.
The contentions made by the husband are correct, but…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Hirt v. HerveyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Eliot v. CoulterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Ice Service Co. v. Phipps EstatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Hegeberg v. New England Fish Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- William H. Low Estate Co. v. Lederer Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- State Room, Inc. v. MA-60 State Associates, L.L.C.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013