Legal Opinion

Fuhrmann v. Seybold

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

All of the facts relating to the plaintiff’s claim and to the set-off were stipulated. So much of the plaintiff’s claim as was allowed by the court is not questioned here. The sole question for determination therefore is whether the court erred in disallowing the set-off. Only so many of the facts as are necessary to an understanding of this controversy will be stated.

On February 1, 1912, at Fort Wayne, Indiana, the plaintiff’s husband, William A. Fuhrmann, made, executed, and delivered to Henrietta Seybold (the present executrix) his promissory note, wherein and whereby, for value received,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. TullerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Clevenger v. MatthewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. Martin (In Re Martin)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  2. Hughes v. FetterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Peoples Trust & Savings Bank v. Standard Printing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In re EckerstorferUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API