Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Smith

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Pound, J. cited: Male v. . Christy, 8 Neb., 264. Savings Bank v. Scott, 10 Id., 83. Barnum v. Young, 10 Id., 309. cited: Davis v. Bank, 5 Neb., 242.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Gel J.

This action was brought upon two promissory notes ■signed by Sarah Cooper and Mrs. H. C. Smith.

The answer by Mrs. H. C. Smith is, “ that she is and was at execution of notes, a married woman and wife of Henry C. Smith, and lived with him as his wife. That she executed said notes as surety, and that she had no interest in the transaction, nor did the consideration thereof accrue to her separate estate, and neither were given in relation thereto. That she received no part of the consideration for which said notes were given, and no benefit accrued from said notes to her or her…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grand Island Banking Co. v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Burns v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Marmet v. MarmetNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Union Stock Yards National Bank v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. First National Bank v. StollNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API