Legal Opinion

In re GNC Corp. Triflex Products Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided December 17, 2013No. MDL No. 2491PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the GNC defendants1 move to centralize this litigation in the Western District of Pennsylvania. The litigation consists of the three actions listed on Schedule A, which are pending in the Southern District of California, the Southern District of Florida, and the Northern District of Ohio, respectively. Additionally, one related action is pending in the Western District of New York.2 Plaintiffs in all actions oppose centralization or, alternatively, request selection of the Southern District of Florida…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re BP P.L.C. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  2. In re Gerova Financial Group, Ltd., Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Natrol, Inc., Glucosamine/Chondroitin Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API