Legal Opinion
Lummus Company v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., (Three Cases)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 21, 1959No. 5552-5554_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant-appellant’s motion to delay discovery until after the decision of its pending appeal from the order of the district court staying arbitration is properly before us. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc., 2 Cir., 1956, 235 F.2d 209; Mesabi Iron Co. v. Reserve Mining Co., 8 Cir., 1959, 268 F.2d 782. We believe it should be granted. We do not rest this decision on the ground that proceeding with discovery may involve lost motion. Rather, we feel appellee makes no satisfactory answer to appellant’s contention that a court order of discovery would be affirmatively inimical to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Commercial Solvents Corp. & Louisiana Liquid Fertilizer Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- In re the Arbitration between Katz & BurkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Mesabi Iron Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Reserve Mining Company, a Minnesota Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Norman C. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Company of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- In re the Arbitration between Stiller Fabrics, Inc. & Michael Saphier Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bradford-Scott Data Corporation, Inc. v. Physician Computer Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Coinbase, Inc. v. BielskiSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Coinbase, Inc. v. BielskiSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- GEA Group AG v. Flex-N-Gate CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Penn Tanker Co. of Delaware v. C.H.Z. Rolimpex, WarszawaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.