Legal Opinion

Star Glass Co. v. Longley & Robinson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Certiorari. Practice in the Superior Court. Sales-Delivery. Before Judge IIillyer. Fulton Superior Court. October Term, lSYO. Reported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Justice.

The bill of exceptions in this case, sets out three grounds of error as having been committed by the judge below upon the hearing of the certiorari, which he sustained and remanded for a new trial before the justice.

1. That the certiorari should have been dismissed because the evidence was not sufficiently verified .by the magistrate to authorize the superior court to pass on the case.

This objection was well taken, because the magistrate had accepted the statement of the counsel in his petition for certiorari as his return, and had certified the same up as being a fair…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. A. J. Neimeyer Lumber Co. v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ford v. ToomerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. State of Ga. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Falvey & Co. v. RichmondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Kronman v. Roush Produce Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API