Legal Opinion

Higgins Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 29, 1977No. Nos. 77-1301, 77-1302PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court correctly held that Minnesota state income taxes on iron ore royalties are not an allowable expenditure under I.R.C. § 272 and thus taxpayers may only deduct them from ordinary income rather than adding those taxes to basis under I.R.C. § 631(c).

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and records and are convinced that no error of law was committed by the trial court. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the opinion of the trial court. Higgins Co. v. United States, 39 AFTR2d 77-702 (1977).

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Fayetteville, Arkansas, of the Estate of Jesse W. Cannon, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. William J. Oetting, of the Estate of Irma H. Dunmeyer, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  3. Estate of Warren v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Galloway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. ESTATE OFCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API