Legal Opinion

Carney v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 25, 2015Published

1DissentLynch, J.

We respectfully dissent, essentially for the same reasons articulated in the dissent in Matter of Acevedo v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs. (132 AD3d 112, 122-126 [2015]).1 The circumstances here are even more compelling. Under the challenged regulation, a lifetime license revocation applies to a person with five or more alcohol-related driving convictions or incidents during his or her lifetime (see 15 NYCRR 136.5 [a] [1]; [b] [1]). Petitioner has six such convictions spanning a period from 1984 to 2010. In contrast to the permanent revocation imposed by respondent Commissioner of Motor…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boreali v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Matter of Acevedo v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Carney v. NYS Department of Motor VehiclesNew York Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API