Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Strom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 18, 1992No. C4-91-1941, C7-91-1870Published
1Opinion of the Court
493 N.W.2d 554 (1992)
STATE of Minnesota, by Hubert H. HUMPHREY, III, Appellant,
v.
Donald O. STROM, et al., and Mildred L. Sponsel, et al., Parcel 40: Woodbridge Plaza, a Limited Partnership, Respondents.
Nos. C4-91-1941, C7-91-1870.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
December 18, 1992.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Sherry A. Enzler, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Donald Mueting, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for appellant.
Richard J. Gunn, Bradley J. Gunn, Minneapolis, for respondent.
Carla Heyl, St. Paul, amicus curiae for League of Minnesota Cities.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
WAHL,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.