Legal Opinion

Brian Lofgren v. AirTrona Canada

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2017No. Case 16-1804Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

This Michigan diversity case presents the question of whether the plaintiff, Brian Lofgren, and the defendants, AirTrona Canada and Salvatore (“Sam”) Barberio, made a franchise agreement under Section 2 of the Michigan Franchise Investment Law 1 and if so, whether the plaintiff, the franchisee, is entitled to rescind the purported agreement and seek restitution under Sections 8 and 31 of the Michigan statute because the franchisor did not provide the franchisee with the required “disclosure statement.” 2

The parties agree that no disclosure statement of any kind was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Jerome-Duncan, Inc. v. Auto-By-Tel, L.L.C., Auto-By-Tel Marketing Corporation, and North Brothers Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Coblentz v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Mazur v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Donald W. Geib, D/B/A Rochester Colonial Amoco v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API