Cleveland v. Ciccone
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WEBSTER, Circuit Judge.
In 1978 this court held that a state prisoner had been denied due process of law when, prior to the opportunity for a hearing, his conditions of confinement were appreciably worsened as the result of a detainer lodged against him for a parole revocation pending in another state. Cooper v. Lockhart, 489 F.2d 308 (8th Cir. 1973).1 Today, in these consolidated habeas corpus actions,2 we hold that federal prisoners are entitled to reasonably prompt hearings on federal parole or release violation warrants and that the heretofore frequent practice of deferring such hearings…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mychael W. McCoy v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Arnold Eugene WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. SielaffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- 15 Fair empl.prac.cas. 904, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7773 Minda Satterwhite on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. City of Greenville, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.