Legal Opinion
Dickstein v. Liboro
Fairfax County Circuit Court
Decided February 13, 1989No. Case No. (Chancery) 106670PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
By JUDGE F. BRUCE BACH
This matter is before this Court on Dickstein’s motion to strike Reynaldo Liboro’s answer and for sanctions and Liboro’s motion for a protective order. The issue is, did Liboro waive his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
It is my opinion that Liboro did not waive his privilege against self-incrimination. Furthermore, Liboro’s motion for a protective order is denied.
Liboro has (1) filed a verified answer in this case in which he specifically denied or admitted the individual factual allegations found in the plaintiff’s bill of complaint; (2)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arndstein v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- United States v. An Article of Drug Consisting of 47 BottlesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jewell v. Ferrell & AssociatesFairfax County Circuit Court · 1989