Legal Opinion

Leland v. Brown

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSenn, J.

Bert H. Brown was the owner of premises at Hamilton, N. Y., which by deed dated October 7, 1926, he conveyed to the defendants William H. Brown and Flora Brown, his wife, thus constituting them tenants by the entirety. At the same time he received back a mortgage of $775 incumbering the premises sold for the balance of the purchase price. This ' was executed by William H. Brown alone, his wife not signing or joining in its execution in any form. The deed and mortgage were executed as one transaction and practically simultaneous, each being dated October 7, 1926, and acknowledged before J. J.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stow v. TifftNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. Perry v. Board of Missions of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the DioceseNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Rawson v. . LampmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  4. Warner v. Van AlstyneNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  5. Warren v. FennNew York Supreme Court · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hopper v. HopperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. In re Syracuse UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. MakiNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Fulton Savings Bank v. DownsNew York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API