Legal Opinion

Joseph K. Buelna v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 2014No. 20S04-1404-CR-243PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSH, Chief Justice.

The severity of a methamphetamine manufacturing offense depends on the weight of “pure or adulterated” drug the defendant manufactures. But the term “adulterated” is ambiguous in the context of the manufacturing process, which has led to divergent interpretations of how to define, and consequently how to weigh, “adulterated” methamphetamine. We construe “adulterated” methamphetamine as a final product, not the total weight of an intermediate mixture still undergoing reaction. This interpretation derives from our precedent discussing “adulterated” drugs, practical…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Drane v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bolin v. WingertIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. City of Carmel v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Michael Day v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Dee Frye v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. Gary Elvers v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Destin Jones v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Corey McAlpin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API