Legal Opinion

Poirier & McLane Corp. v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided September 3, 1958No. Claim No. 33146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSidney Squire, J.

The defendant, State of New York, moves, pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice, to dismiss the claim upon the ground that said claim has been released.

To obviate any question as to the timeliness of the motion, the lawyers have executed a formal stipulation agreeing that the motion may be made now because the parties desire that the issue of release “be disposed of on motion in advance of any trial on the merits On the oral argument and in the respective briefs, counsel have confirmed the foregoing.

On July 14,1950, after appropriate bidding, the parties hereto…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oakhill Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  2. Cauldwell-Wingate Company v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Buffalo Electric Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. County Excavation, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1964
  2. Lasker-Goldman Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1959
  3. Yonkers Contracting Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API