Benedict v. Indeed Corporation
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Lance M Benedict, No. CV-23-02291-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Indeed Corporation, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Defendant Indeed, Inc. (“Defendant”) has filed a Motion to Dismiss pro se Plaintiff 16 Lance Benedict’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint. (Doc. 9). Plaintiff has filed a Response and 17 Defendant has filed a Reply. (Docs. 11–12). Plaintiff has also filed a one-paragraph 18 Motion for Leave to Amend his Complaint. (Doc. 26). The Court must dismiss Plaintiff’s 19 Complaint for the following reasons. 20…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.