Legal Opinion

Benedict v. Indeed Corporation

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 18, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02291Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Lance M Benedict, No. CV-23-02291-PHX-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Indeed Corporation, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Defendant Indeed, Inc. (“Defendant”) has filed a Motion to Dismiss pro se Plaintiff 16 Lance Benedict’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint. (Doc. 9). Plaintiff has filed a Response and 17 Defendant has filed a Reply. (Docs. 11–12). Plaintiff has also filed a one-paragraph 18 Motion for Leave to Amend his Complaint. (Doc. 26). The Court must dismiss Plaintiff’s 19 Complaint for the following reasons. 20…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API