Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1968No. 41373PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is rape; the punishment, death.

Appellant’s brief filed in the trial court sets forth six grounds of error.

Ground 1 complains of the overruling of his motion to suppress the written confession; the finding that such confession was freely and voluntarily made; and the failure to find that appellant had knowingly and intelligently waived the appointment of counsel at the time the statement was given.

The confession in writing made October 18, 1966, was introduced in evidence at appellant’s trial on September 5, 1967.

The evidence adduced at the hearing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Ellison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. McCandless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Pittman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Boulware v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Hackbarth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Moon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API