Legal Opinion

Ard v. Samedan Oil Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 24, 1986No. 85-C-1931PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

483 So.2d 925 (1986)

Eddie L. ARD and Maxine Ard

v.

SAMEDAN OIL CORPORATION, et al.

No. 85-C-1931.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 24, 1986.

Paul Dué, Walter Landry Smith, Due, Dodson, deGravelles, Robinson & Caskey, Baton Rouge, for plaintiffs-applicants.

William E. Scott, Watson, Blanche, Wilson & Posner, Baton Rouge, for defendants-respondents.

MARCUS, Justice.

Eddie L. Ard and his wife, Maxine Ard, instituted this action against Samedan Oil Corporation (Samedan), a mineral lessee of plaintiffs, and Seiscom Delta United Corporation (Seiscom), formerly doing business as United Geophysical…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Reck v. StevensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. Carollo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  4. Temple v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  5. Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Lugenbuhl v. DowlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Musser Davis Land Co. v. Union Pacific ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Williams v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  4. Beckham v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Davis v. CulpepperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API