Legal Opinion

Hattersly v. Waterville (Vil.)

Lucas Circuit Court

Decided February 23, 1904Published

ERROR to Lucas common pleas court.

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

This action Was brought in the court below by the village of Water-ville against the Northern National Bank of Toledo, Ohio, and after-wards William R. Hattersly, the plaintiff in error, was also made a party defendant. The action was brought on a certified check for $2,500, drawn by C. E. Sutton in favor of said William R. Hattersly and afterwards endorsed by him to the village of Waterville. The check was deposited by the Toledo, Defiance & Napoleon Railroad Company with the village of Waterville to secure the carrying out of a bid and guarantee of good faith of such company, which proposed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Salem v. AnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Nilson v. JonesboroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  3. Peekskill v. Village of PeekskillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Peekskill, State Camp & Mohegan Railroad v. Village of PeekskillNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API