Legal Opinion

Cargill Ferrous International v. Sea Phoenix MV

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 9, 2003No. 01-31193Published

1Opinion of the Court

325 F.3d 695

CARGILL FERROUS INTERNATIONAL, a Department of Cargill Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,

v.

SEA PHOENIX MV, etc.; et al., Defendants,

SEA PHOENIX MV, her engines, tackle, apparel, etc., in rem; COSCO (Singapore) Private Ltd., in personam; Western Bulk Carriers, in personam, Defendants-Appellees, and

Serene Sky Shipping Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

No. 01-31193.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 9, 2003.

John Francis Fay, Jr. (argued), Joseph Edward Lee, III, Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, LA, for Cargill Ferrous Intern.

Christopher…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Capron v. Van NoordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1804
  4. Leadertex, Inc. v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. William G. Walker and Sandra O. Walker v. J.C. Bradford & Co., Milburn L. Bryant, Mary C. Bryant and Sandra L. Bryant v. J.C. Bradford & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API