Legal Opinion

Ensley v. Snapper, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered April 3, 2008, which conditionally granted defendant Snapper’s motion to preclude plaintiff from offering certain evidence at trial, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about May 6, 2008, which denied plaintiffs motion to vacate or modify the prior order and precluded the testimony of plaintiffs expert for all purposes, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to comply in a timely fashion with three discovery orders, and failed to offer a reasonable excuse (see Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118 [1999]) or set forth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kihl v. PfefferNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Raes Pharmacy, Inc. v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Tejeda v. 750 Gerard Properties Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. AWL Industries, Inc. v. QBE InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API