Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Peer
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 3, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Williams, S.
Questions are raised as to the distribution of the surplus of this estate.
Sarah Peer died intestate on May 8, 1929. She left her surviving neither husband, children, representative of a child, nor next of kin. The estate consisted of a bank deposit of upwards $4,000, and certain household furniture valued at $34.
Mrs. Peer had been twice married. Her first husband was Richard March Pringle, who died September 22, 1894. Her second husband was Wallace L. Peer, whom she married January 15, 1896, and who died September 13, 1926. The first husband, Pringle, had been previously married…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KlatzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Ametrano v. . DownsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- In re the Estate of LeslieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- In re the Estate of RayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1895
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of StorumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of O'ConnorNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of PeerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931