Legal Opinion

Vinlis Construction Co. v. Roreck

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1970PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Since the allegations of the complaint do not assert a fraud “aimed at the public generally” (Walker v. Sheldon, 10 N Y 2d 401, 405; see also, James v. Powell, 19 N Y 2d 249, 260), plaintiffs are not entitled to exemplary damages. The record contains all of the proof required to make a final disposition of this case. Based on the plaintiffs’ uncontradicted evidence, the net amount of compensatory damages is $74,942.67. In addition, the faithless trustee should be surcharged in the amount of $9,316, the salary paid him in the course of his stewardship. Plaintiffs are also entitled…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Donovan v. BierwirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. In re the Estate of SchnareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Kramer v. LOCKWOOD PENSION SERVICES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API