Vinlis Construction Co. v. Roreck
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Since the allegations of the complaint do not assert a fraud “aimed at the public generally” (Walker v. Sheldon, 10 N Y 2d 401, 405; see also, James v. Powell, 19 N Y 2d 249, 260), plaintiffs are not entitled to exemplary damages. The record contains all of the proof required to make a final disposition of this case. Based on the plaintiffs’ uncontradicted evidence, the net amount of compensatory damages is $74,942.67. In addition, the faithless trustee should be surcharged in the amount of $9,316, the salary paid him in the course of his stewardship. Plaintiffs are also entitled…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Donovan v. BierwirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- In re the Estate of SchnareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Kramer v. LOCKWOOD PENSION SERVICES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.