Legal Opinion

Navarro Oil Co. v. Cross

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1941No. 14196PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This suit grew out of an oil and gas lease covering a tract of land bearing a mineral classification, executed pursuant to Articles 5367 et seq., Revised Civil Statutes, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 5367 et seq., commonly known as the Relinquishment Act. The lease was executed by defendant and wife as lessors, in favor of plaintiff, as lessee.

Plaintiff, Navarro Oil Company, sued defendant, John T. Cross, for the sum of $6,-000, alleging that the purchase price or bonus paid for the lease was $12,000; that plaintiff did not know that at the time this money was paid that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Greene v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Freiberg, Kline & Co. v. MagaleTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Cowden v. Broderick & Calvert, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. TippettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Navarro Oil Co. v. CrossTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Duffey v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Navarro Oil Co. v. CrossTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. LutzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Cross v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API