Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pressley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 23, 1985No. 83-368Published

1DissentSharp, Judge

I think this case should be reversed because Pressley was not read her Miranda rights1 prior to the commencement of an interview at the police station on March 10th when, after two and one-half hours of interrogation, she made a confession. It was the sole direct evidence linking her to the homicide in this case. Accordingly, the confession should have been suppressed and its admission at trial was reversible error. Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433, 94 S.Ct. 2357, 41 L.Ed.2d 182 (1974); Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); Davis v. North Carolina, 384 U.S.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API