Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Oakwood at Madison, Inc. v. Township of Madison

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 26, 1977Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPashman, J.

OUTLINE OF CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION

I Limited Agreement with Majority 555

II The Need for Affirmative Relief 556

III The Nature of Affirmative Judicial Relief 576

(A) Remedial Objectives 577

(B) Procedural Approach 582

(C) Calculation of the Municipal “Pair Share” of Regional Housing Needs 588

(D) Imposition of Remedial Devices 595(1) Award Specific Relief to Corporate Plaintiffs 596(2) Enjoin Interference with Construction of Low and Moderate Income Housing 601(3) Establish “Set-Aside” or “Override” Procedures to Pacilitate Construction of Low and Moderate Income Housing 602

*555(4) Declare…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API