Biscoe v. Tucker
Supreme Court of Arkansas
On precisely the case, no more arid no less, which was before this court, when it decided it before, the Circuit Court has deliberately reversed the decision of this court; and refused to decree in conformity to its opinion, judgment and express and positive mandate. We merely say that this gross contempt of this court and authority is error.
Read the full summary
On precisely the case, no more arid no less, which was before this court, when it decided it before, the Circuit Court has deliberately reversed the decision of this court; and refused to decree in conformity to its opinion, judgment and express and positive mandate. We merely say that this gross contempt of this court and authority is error. As to the claim of Wright under the pretended lien — supposing him to mean the south-easi quarter of section 19, and admitting that McLain had a vendor’s lien, still that lien was not good against the mortgages. A vendor’s lien is only good against the…
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Watkins,
delivered the opinion of the Court..
The bill in this case, exhibited on the 10th of June, 1843, represents that upon the organization of the Real Estate Bank, fifty shares of stock were awarded to Wood Tucker, for which he executed his stockbondin the sum of five thousand dollars, bearing interest atfive per cent.,together withamortgage on certainlands to secure the same, the mortgage pursuant to the charter being also conditioned for the payment of all monies which he might receive from the Bank on account of subscriptions for stock therein, and the interest on such…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dawson v. Real Estate BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1843
- Kelly v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1843
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilborn v. ElstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Gamble v. GibsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
- O'Quin v. O'QuinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Rankin v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905