Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Messenger

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 26, 1913No. 1,897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Peter Anderson against Rosewell E. Messenger on certain appeal bonds.

1Opinion of the Court

KILLITS, District Judge.

This case is before the court on three motions for judgment against the surety on appeal and cost bonds. By consent, the motion as to the cost bond is allowed. The controversy arises upon appeal bonds in the sums of $250 and $500, respectively.

In order to understand the exact point raised, this short history of the case is necessary to be stated: Anderson, a resident of Tennessee, began an action in ejectment against Messenger to recover property in this district. 146 Fed. 929, 77 C. C. A. 179, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1094; 158 Fed. 250, 85 C. C. A. 468; 225 U. S. 436, 32…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Hinckley v. . KreitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Babbitt v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Robinson v. . PlimptonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  5. Anderson v. MessingerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Montgomery v. American Employers' Ins.District Court, D. Delaware · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API