Legal Opinion
Travelers Insurance v. Ansley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 4, 1963No. 39995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge.
Where an insurance agency contract provides that any cash advances made to the agent are to be repaid from premiums earned by the agent and, thereafter, by 61 separate signed receipts the agent agreed to repay on demand the advances made, these 61 signed receipts constituted an express or implied promise by the agent to repay any excess of advances over the commissions earned. Smith v. Franklin Printing Co., 54 Ga. App. 385 (2) (187 SE 904); Valdosta Roofing &c. Co. v. Lawrence, 89 Ga. App. 168 (79 SE2d 10); and Wilson v. Naumann, 87 Ga. App. 824 (75 SE2d 295). The signed receipts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hewlett v. AlmandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Smith v. Franklin Printing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Valdosta Roofing & Supply Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Elyea-Austell Co. v. Jackson GarageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- McGregor v. Bensinger Self-Adding Register Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Company v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. TealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Travelers Insurance Company v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Travelers Insurance v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965