Legal Opinion

Maham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 22, 1983No. 82-920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Judge.

Jeffrey Maham has filed a timely appeal with this court contesting the length of sentences given for various crimes committed. Because Maham was classified as a youthful offender, we find that two of his three sentences are illegal and, accordingly, vacate those sentences and remand for re-sentencing under the Youthful Offender Act, section 958.05, Florida Statutes (1981).

Maham was charged with two counts of burglary of a dwelling,1 one count of grand theft in the second degree of a motor vehicle,2 and two counts of grand theft in the second degree.3 Maham entered pleas of nolo…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitlock v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Patterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Waugh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Savino v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Kuey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API