Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brown v. Habrle

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 5, 2010No. Docket: Aro-10-13Published

1Concurrence

SILVER, J.,

with whom SAUFLEY, C.J. and JABAR, J., join, concurring.

[¶ 21] I concur in the Court’s opinion, including its holding that the District Court erred in determining that the post-*407judgment interest statute was not implicated in this case. I agree that post-judgment interest can legally be assessed on the judgment amount. I write separately to emphasize that the court should, on remand, determine the issue of whether Brown has shown good cause for a waiver of that post-judgment interest.

[¶ 22] Title 14 M.R.S. § 1602-C(2) (2009) provides for post-judgment interest accruing from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Austin v. AustinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Carter v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  3. Walsh v. CusackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Tarbuck v. JaeckelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard BeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API