Legal Opinion
Matter of Baby K
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 1, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 93-68-A (filed under seal)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HILTON, District Judge.
This case was tried before the court, and upon the evidence presented and argument of counsel, the court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiff Hospital is a general acute care hospital located in Virginia that is licensed to provide diagnosis, treatment, and medical and nursing services to the public as . provided by Virginia law. Among other facilities, the Hospital has a Pediatric Intensive Care Department and an Emergency Department.
2. The Hospital is a recipient of federal and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In the Matter of Baby "K" (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Bottoms v. BottomsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
- Jordan v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- In re K.I.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Shepherd v. United States Olympic CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.