Legal Opinion

Cullen v. Clean Water Services

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 15, 2025No. A182859PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

228 October 15, 2025 No. 900 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Nathan CULLEN, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEAN WATER SERVICES, a public water resource management utility, and Diane Taniguchi-Dennis, an individual, Defendants-Respondents. Washington County Circuit Court 23CV03815; A182859 Andrew Erwin, Judge. Argued and submitted September 9, 2025. Matthew Malmsheimer argued the cause for appellant. Also on the briefs were Christopher Lundberg and Haglund Kelley, LLP. Ruth A. Casby argued the cause for respondents. Also on the brief was Hart Wagner, LLP. Before Tookey,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States of America, Ex Rel. Maynard Bernard v. Casino Magic Corp., a Minnesota Corporation Casino Magic American Corp., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. Beneficial Oregon, Inc. v. BivinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Caro v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Eberhardt v. Providence Health & Servs. Or.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. Smith v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cullen v. Clean Water ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API